<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moving Maven Repository Metadata Files</title>
	<link>http://www.patrickschneider.com/blog/2007/05/moving-maven-repository-metadata-files/</link>
	<description>food, technology, programming, health, fitness, judo</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 05:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Google Seems to be Case Sensitive &#124; blog &#124; patrick schneider</title>
		<link>http://www.patrickschneider.com/blog/2007/05/moving-maven-repository-metadata-files/#comment-6</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.patrickschneider.com/blog/2007/05/moving-maven-repository-metadata-files/#comment-6</guid>
					<description>[...] I was recently seeing how well a fairly long, extremely specific blog title was indexed by Google. My general thinking has been that niche titles will appear high in search indices when Googled word-for-word. That is, even without surrounding the query in quotation marks, I would expect that a Google search for: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I was recently seeing how well a fairly long, extremely specific blog title was indexed by Google. My general thinking has been that niche titles will appear high in search indices when Googled word-for-word. That is, even without surrounding the query in quotation marks, I would expect that a Google search for: [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
